ارتش پاکستان و سیاست خارجی (مطالعه موردی: بحران کشمیر، بحران دیوراند و تروریسم)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آیت الله بروجردی، بروجرد، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آیت الله بروجردی، بروجرد، ایران

چکیده

امروزه نفوذ و دخالت نظامیان پاکستان در سیاست به یک روند عادی تبدیل شده است. در طول تاریخ ۷۵ ساله این کشور،‌ هیچ دولتی نتوانسته است دوره پنج سال خود را تکمیل کند. این امر جایگاه بالای نظامیان در ساختار سیاسی این کشور را نشان می‌دهد. هدف از مقاله حاضر، بررسی تأثیرگذاری نظامیان بر راهبردهای سیاست خارجی  پاکستان است. بر این اساس،‌ این پژوهش با استفاده از روش کیفی و رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی به دنبال پاسخ به این سؤال است که ارتش پاکستان چگونه بر راهبرد‌های سیاست خارجی این کشور تأثیرگذار بوده است؟ در پاسخ به سؤال مذکور این فرضیه مطرح شده است که «ارتش پاکستان با کنترل سه راهبرد اصلی سیاست خارجی یعنی ضرورت موازنه سازی داخلی و خارجی در برابر هند، مسأله دیوراند و ضرورت عدم شکل‌گیری دولت قوی در افغانستان و مبارزه با تروریسم توانسته است جایگاه عالی خود در ساخت سیاسی این کشور را حفظ نموده و به بازیگر اصلی در سیاستگذاری خارجی تبدیل شود». گردآوری منابع به صورت کتابخانه‌ای و استفاده از مجلات تخصصی و سایت‌های معتبر اینترنتی بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Pakistan Army and Foreign Policy (Case Study: Kashmir Crisis, Durand Crisis and Terrorism)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Mohammad Nia 1
  • Naser Pourhassan 2
1 Assistant Professor,, Department of Political Science, Ayatollah Borujerdi University
2 Associate Professor , Department of Political Science, Ayatollah Borujerdi University
چکیده [English]

  Today, the influence and interference of the Pakistani military in politics has become a normal process. During the 75-year history of this country, no government has been able to complete its five-year term. This indicates the high position of the military in the political structure of this country. The purpose of this article is to investigate the influence of the military on Pakistan's foreign policy strategies. (Target) On this basis, this research by using a qualitative method and a descriptive analytical approach, seeks to answer the question of how the Pakistani army has influenced the foreign policy strategies of the country? The hypothesis of the article is that “By controlling the three main strategies of foreign policy, i.e. the necessity of internal and external balancing against India, the Durand problem and the necessity of not forming a strong government in Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism, the Pakistani army has been able to maintain its high position in the political structure of this country and become a key actor in Pakistan's foreign policy.” The collection of sources has been in the form of a library and the use of specialized magazines and reliable internet sites.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pakistan
  • army
  • Praetorianism
  • Kashmir
  • Durand
  • terrorism
  • Afghanistan
Acemoglu, Daron and et.al. (2010). A Theory of Military Dictatorships. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, available at: https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/a%20theory%20of%20military%20dictatorships.pdf
Ahmed, A. (2023). The rise of military capital in Pakistan: Military neoliberalism, authoritarianism and urbanization. Geoforum, 146(1).
Ahmadi, J.و Obedience, I. (2014). Geopolitical analysis of relations between Pakistan and its neighbors: tensions and threats. Political and International Studies, 7(24), 1-24 (In Persian)
Aqil Sh. (2014). Constraining consolidation: military politics and democracy in Pakistan (2007–2013). Democratization, 2014, 2(6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.781586
Britannica. (2023). Praetorian Guard. Mar 21, available at: https://www.britannica.com/place/Roman-Empire
Bahmani Qajar, M.A. (2003). Territorial disputes between Afghanistan and Pakistan according to the historical documents of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Research Service Documentation Center (In Persian)
Clapham, Christopher & Philip, George. (1985). The Political Dilemmas of Military Regimes, London: Crooin Helm.
Congressional Research Service. (2023). Terrorist and Other Militant Groups in Pakistan. Dec 01, available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/pakmil.pdf
Davodundi, N., Zargar, A., Shirzadi, R. (2019). An analytical introduction to the Iranian Islamic Revolution from the perspective of the comprehensive model of nation-building. Islamic Revolution Studies, 17(61), 59-90(In Persian)
El-Shimy, Yasser. (2016). A Model of Praetorian States, Middle East Initiative, Belfer Center, at: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/2016-01-MEI_RFWP_ElShimy_0.pdf
Esposito, J.L. (2016). State and contemporary Islamic movements. Translated by Alireza Samii and Mohammad Hajipour, Tehran: Contemporary view (In Persian)
Farzana, Sh. (2009). Making Sense of Pakistan, London: Foundation Books, Hurst $ Company.
Finer, S.E. (1962). The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. London: Pall Mall.
Harris, G. (2017). U.S. Gives Military Assistance to Pakistan, With Strings Attached. New York Times, Aug 30, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/us/politics/us-aid-pakistan-terror.html
Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huntington, S.P. (1957). The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics ofCivil- Military Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.
Hussain, E. (2022). The Military and Foreign Policy in Pakistan: An Analysis. In Ghulam Ali (ed) Pakistan's Foreign Policy, London: Routledge, Doi: 10.4324/9781003250920-5
Jalal, A. ( 2014). Th  struggle for Pakistan: a Muslim homeland and global politics. Th e Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Khan, Sh. (2009). The Military and the Praetorian Regimes in Pakistan Politics: Political Usurpers or Protectors of an Incipient Democracy?. Journal of International Studies, 5(1), avaivale at: https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/7890/943
Khatoon, H. (2023). Guardians and Governors: The Multifaceted Role of the Pakistan Army in National Development and Islamic Ethics. Al-Nasr, 2(3).
Kumar lambah, S. (2011). The Durand Line. (Issue 4 of Policy paper).Aspen Institute India.Kumar, Sanjay. (2020). Military Intervention in Pakistani-Politics and Indo-Pak Relations. International Journal of Trade and Commerce, 9(2), pp. 319-336.
Mir, A., Salikuddi, T. (2022). Five Key Issues Facing Pakistan’s New Army Chief. United States Institute of Peace. November 30,available at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/11/five-key-issues-facing-pakistans-new-army-chief
Mohammadnia, M., Saifi, A.M. (2023). The position of ACOS alliance in the foreign policy of the United States towards China and its consequences. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 37(2), 109-134 (In Persian)
Molazhi, PM. (2005). Security opportunities and threats beyond the Islamic Republic of Iran in the perspective of Afghanistan. In the book of international security, Tehran: Abrar Mazazer(In Persian) 
Needler, Martin C. 1987. The Problem of Democracy in Latin America. Lexington, MA: Lexington
Nordlinger, A. (1977). Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments, Publisher: Prentice-Hall.
Nikunahad, A., Biuck, M., & Ramezani, M. (2023). Future Scenarios of the Kashmir Crisis based on Actors' Interests. Crisis Studies of the Islamic World10(2), 48-81. doi: 10.27834/CSIW.2312.1321.2.29.1 (In Persian) 
Parent, J., Rosato, S. (2015). Balancing in Neorealism. International Security.40(2), pp. 51-86. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43828295
Perlmutter, A. (1974). Egypt: The Praetorian State.  New York: Routledge.
Pourhassan, N., & Mohammadnia, M. (2023). Territorial Disputes Between Afghanistan and Pakistan and Their Impact on the National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Political Socology of Islamic World11(22), 29-60 (In Persian)
Rizvi, H.A. (2015). The Military and Pakistan’s Political and Security Disposition. Asia Policy, No.19, pp. 147-151.
Rizvi, H.A. (2004). Pakistan: Civil-military Relations in a Praetorian State. in R.J. May and Viberto Selochan (eds.), The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University Press.
Simbar, R., & salehiyan, T. (2017). The evolutions of international system after the cold war and the new variations of force balanc. Journal of Politics and International Relations1(1), 33-51. doi: 10.22080/jpir.2017.1691(In Persian)
The Diplomat. (2022). Taliban-Pakistan Ties Run Into Trouble. Jan 11, available at: https://thediplomat.com/2022/01/taliban-pakistan-ties-run-into-trouble/
Tim Willasey-Wilsey CMG.  (2023). The Paradox of the Pakistan Army. Rusi, 20 September, available at: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/paradox-pakistan-army
Time. (2018). Why Real Regional Power Lies With Pakistan’s Military, Not Its New Prime Minister”. Jul 27, available at: https://time.com/5351080/pakistan-military-imran-khan
Tasnim (11/08/2013). Musharraf: Pakistan's foreign policy proceeds with the intervention of the Chief of Army Staff. available at: https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1393/11/08/635759 (In Persian)
Washington Post. (2023). Imran Khan increasingly isolated as Pakistan’s army pressures allies. May 28, avaiable at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/05/28/imran-khan-pakistan-army/
Weinbaum, M.G. (2023). Afghan refugees as victims of Pakistan and Afghanistan’s clashing security interests. Middle East Institute, November 7, available at: https://www.mei.edu/publications/afghan-refugees-victims-pakistan-and-afghanistans-clashing-security-interests
World Bank. (2023). Military expenditure (current USD) – Pakistan. available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.CD?locations=PK
Zaidi, S.A. (2011). Who Benefits From U.S. Aid to Pakistan?. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, September 21, available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/pakistan_aid2011.pdf