Explaining the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Based on Hedging Strategy; A Model for Reducing Threats and Increasing Benefits

Karimifard, Hossien

doi:10.27834/CSIW.2501.1492.2.37.1

Explaining the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Based on Hedging Strategy; A Model for Reducing Threats and Increasing Benefits

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Hossien Karimifard

Deparment of political science,ahvaz branch,islamic azad university,ahvaz,I ran

10.27834/CSIW.2501.1492.2.37.1

Abstract

Hedging strategy functions not only as a political and security tool, but also as a complex and multidimensional strategy in international relations that requires careful analysis of threats and opportunities. This research examines Iran's foreign policy within the framework of the hedging strategy that strikes a balance between the two approaches of cooperation and balancing. The main goal of the research is to analyze the feasibility and consequences of adopting this strategy in Iran's foreign policy in the complex regional security environment and anarchic international system. The research question is how can the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran be explained within the framework of the hedging strategy as a model for managing threats and opportunities. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The hypothesis is the proposition that within the framework of the hedging strategy as a multilateral and risk-reducing approach, the Islamic Republic of Iran can manage threats to the international system and secure benefits, and create new opportunities for diplomatic and economic interactions by relying on strengthening domestic capacities, expanding strategic depth, and utilizing targeted diplomacy. The research findings show that in conditions of mutual distrust and uncertainty in the regional order, the hedging strategy has high flexibility and allows Iran to establish a more balanced interaction between regional and international powers. The main conclusion is that the hedging strategy, considering structural and normative bottlenecks, is the most appropriate option for increasing Iran's bargaining power.

Keywords

Hedging strategy

foreign policy

Iran

international politics

National interests

20.1001.1.29811104.1404.12.2.1.4

Aliyar, H., & Ranjbar, M. (2024). The Strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Middle Eastern Security Complex with an Emphasis on Smart Power (a Case Study of the Iraq and Syria Crisis), Crisis Studies of the Islamic World, Autumn Vol. 11, No.3 (34), doi: 10.27834/CSIW.2405.1401.3.34.1 [In Persian]

Bianco, C. (2020). Gulf of difference: How Europe can get the gulf Monarchies to pursue peace with Iran, European Council on Foreign Relations. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/234806/Cinzia_Gulf-of-difference-How-Europe-can-get-the-Gulf-monarchies-to-pursue-peace-with-Iran.pdf.

Bowen, W. (2015). living with nuclear hedging: the implications of Iran’s nuclear strategy, International Affairs, 91(4), 687-707.‏ Available: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/field/field_document/INTA91_4_01_BowenMoran.pdf.

Derakhshande Lerzjani, M. & Shafiei, N. (2022). United States Policy Towards China in the Framework of the hedging Strategy, A Quarterly Journal of World Politics, 15( 2), Summer, pp. 7-38 [In Persian]

Gerst, A. (2024). Southeast Asia’s Grand Strategy: Hedging, Available: https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/08/12/southeast-asias-grand-strategy-hedging/

Goh, E. (2005). Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies, Available: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/26086/PS016.pdf

Goh, E. (2006). Understanding “hedging” in Asia-Pacific security. Pacific Forum CSIS, https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/pac0643.pdf

Gonzalez, P. I. (2024). Theorising the Hedging Strategy: National Interests, Objectives, and Mixed Foreign Policy Instruments, All Azimuth, V0l 13, N0 2, pp.: 193-214, DOI:10.20991/allazimuth.1480020

Haacke, J. (2019). The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: a critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Volume 19, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages 375–417, https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz010

Hamdi, S., & Salman, M. (2020). The Hedging Strategy of Small Persian Gulf States, Asian Politics & Policy, 12(2), 127–152, DOI: 10.1111/aspp.12528

He. K– Feng, H. (2023). after hedging Hard Choices for the Indo-Pacific States between the US and China, https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/after-Hedging /ECB94D5F098F5B42D35BCA5353077529

Johnston, T. & others (2022). Could the Houthis Be the Next Hizballah? Iranian Proxy Development in Yemen and the Future of the Houthi Movement,Available: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2500/RR2551/RAND_RR2551.pdf

Kim, M. h. (2023). Hedging between the United States and China? South Korea’s ideology-driven behavior and its implications for national security, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 23(1), pp: 129–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcab020

Kouleas, J. (2023). Saudi Arabian Foreign Policy and Hedging: Playing its Cards Right, Available: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1329&context=major-papers

Kuik, C. & Rozman, (2018). Light or heavy Hedging: positioning between china and united states, Available:https://www.keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/introduction_-_light_or_heavy_hedging.pdf

Kuik, C. C. & Nur Shahadah, J. (2024). The Feasibility and Future of Middle-state Hedging, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S1793930524000254

Kuik, C. C. (2021). getting hedging right: a small-state perspective, China International Strategy Review 3(3), DOI: 10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.

------------ (2023A), Binary trap threatens ASEAN’s hedging role, https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/08/01/binary-trap-threatens-aseans-hedging-role/

------------------- (2023B), hedging in International Relations, https://eair-caucus.org/project/Hedging -in-international-relations.

--------------------, (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore's Response to a Rising China January 2008Contemporary Southeast Asia A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 30(2):159-185, DOI:10.1353/csa.0.0023-

Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company.

Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 145-167.

Nedic, P. (2022). Hedging Strategy as a Response to the United States-China Rivalry: The Case of Southeast Asia, The Review of International Affairs, 73(1185):91-112, DOI:10.18485/iipe_ria.2022.73.1185.5

Puri, S. (2017). The Strategic Hedging of Iran, Russia, and China: Juxtaposing Participation in the Global System with Regional Revisionism, Journal of Global Security Studies, 2( 4),pp: 307–323, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogx015

Sari al-Qalam, M. (2024). Deficiencies in Iran's Foreign Policy, http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2023396 [In Persian]

Telci, İ. N. (2021). Hedging as a Survival Strategy for Small States: The Case of Kuwait, All Azimuth, V10, N2, 2021, 213-229.

Vennet, N. V. (2018). Strategic Hedging and Changes in Geopolitical Capabilities for Second-Tier States, Chinese Political Science Review 4(6),DOI:10.1007/s41111-018-0111-5

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.

Yuzhu, W. (2022). Hedging Strategy: Concept, Behavior, and Implications for China-ASEAN Relations,Available: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S2737557921500121?srsltid=AfmBOoqh1ZZXNIrtplH-jtwXwT4tsrJvt6XZldaMH2xlKW0GVhIYYikh

Zohul-Qadr, I. (2024). The Principle of Securing Foreign Policy in a Chaotic World, http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2021873/ [In Persian]