Future Scenarios of the Kashmir Crisis based on Actors' Interests

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Khatam Al Anbia Air Defense University

2 Assistant Professor of Khatam Al-Anbia Army Air Defense University

3 p h.D of Political Science,

Abstract

There are many critical and controversial geographic regions in the Asian, some of which are the legacy of British colonialism. Each of these areas has the capacity to turn into a full-scale conflict region. Kashmir is one of the regions that has been the place of conflict between the governments of the South Asian region (India-Pakistan and China) for more than seventy years, and the dispute between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region has caused three wars in 1948, 1965, and1971. The current research seeks to answer the question; what scenarios can be drawn for the future of the Kashmir crisis? This article has answered this question by using the method of actor interest analysis (beneficiary) - which is one of the relatively new methods in the science of future research. The findings of the research show that based on the interests of the main actors and participants in the crisis, the scenarios of referendum for Kashmir independence, maintaining the status quo, joining India, joining Pakistan, the possibility of an all-out war between India and Pakistan and the outbreak of civil war in Kashmir was drawn. The most possible realistic situation that can be imagined for the future of the Kashmir region is the continuation of the status quo (uncertainty of the Kashmir region) or the increase of tensions between the two countries of India and Pakistan and, accordingly, Radical movements will be taken by popular and Muslim movements and movements inside Kashmir.

Keywords


Amin, M. and Naseer, R. (2017). Indian Opposition to Chinese Belt and Road Initiative: Response, Rationale and Action. Central Asia Journal 3(81): 13-34.
Bhatt, S.C. Land and people of Indian states and union Territories. Kalpaz publications, 36 volumes, 2006.
Bots, P.W.G., Van Twist, M.J.W., Van Duin, J.H.R. (2000). Automatic pattern detection in stakeholder networks. In: Nunamaker, J.F., Sprague, R.H. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
Brugha, R., Varvasovsky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning 15, 239–246.
Census 2011 published by Govt. of India for Jammu and Kashmir state. https://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/districtlist/jammu+and+kashmir.html.
Chevalier, J.M., Buckles, D.J. (2008). SAS2: a Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement. Sage Publications.
Devonshire-Ellis, C. (2017). Russia Connecting with India via International North-South Transport Corridor. Russia Briefing, 22 May, Available at: https://www.russia-briefing.com/news/russia connecting-india-via-internationalnorth-south-transport-corridor.html, Accessed on: 29 February 2019.
Friedman, A., Miles, S. )2006(. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hermans, L., Kwakkel, J., Thissen, W., Koppenjan, J., & Bots, P. (2010). Policy analysis of multi-actor systems. The Hague: Lemma.
James, P., Ghose, G. (2005). Third Party Intervention in Ethno-Religious Conflict: Role Theory, Pakistan, and War in Kashmir, 1965. Terrorism and Political Violence. Vol. 17.
James, P. (2005). Third- party Intervention in Ethno- Religious Conflict: Role Theory, Pakistan, and War in Kashmir, 1965». Terrorism and Political violence, vol 17, No 3, 2005: 427-445.
Klijn, E.-H. (1997). Policy networks: An overview. In: Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.-H.
Mitroff, I. I. (1983). Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
P.N.K. B. (1991). Geography of the jammu and Kashmir stste, new Delhi: light and life publishers.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of environmental management90(5), 1933-1949.
Sabatier, P.A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21, 129–168.
Zutshi, C. (2004). Languages of Belonging: Islam, Regional Identity, and the Making of Kashmir, Hurst & Co., London (2004). and Oxford University Press, New York (2004).